Are you someone who tells it straight, like you see it? When asked your thoughts about, say, an idea, would you use all of your feedback time to explain what doesn’t work about it? If yes, know that there are choice words others may be using to describe you—best shared when you’re out of earshot. A tamer one is editor.
Consider what we expect an editor to do with our copy. In simple terms, an editor alerts writers on what’s wrong with their words, their construction of sentences and ultimately their ideas. Realistically though, the editor-writer partnership is complex. It’s no surprise then when the relationship turns contentious. Think Thomas Wolfe and Maxwell Perkins or Sylvia Plath and Ted Hughes. Apparently, a passionate contention can still result in writing that’s well received.
But try looking at it this way
An editor doesn’t have to be the writer’s nemesis. The job is such that it requires a tactful flag on what won’t work for your audience. For example, depending on the type of writing and its intended audience, the following can happen.
Burying your key message in the last paragraph? That’ll get flagged.
Introducing what studies are saying without sourcing? Expect a flag.
Referring to people of colour as “coloured people”? It’ll probably be flagged.
Spelling a name differently throughout the copy? Definite flag.
Like everything in life, we need balance
Balance is the reason why editors worth their salt will review copy and also tell writers what works. Of course, it’s not their sole focus, but occasional comments confirming what’s effective can help move writing forward.
And honestly, editing copy is not a job of flagging as much as it is a job of supporting. As writer, once you’ve communicated your goals, expect your editor to suggest how to improve your writing. As well, feel no way to ask for feedback on the things you’re doing right.